Jennifer Lopez is fighting to keep privately owned video footage the girl once got with her first partner, Ojani Noa, from discovering the light of day. It — which contains 27 several hours of video — apparently includes sexual situations through the pair’s vacation back in 1997. Noa attempted to sell the tape, which includes sparked the best battle with the sultry singer.

But the 41-year-old singer was able to get a courtroom order with the exception Noa right from releasing the tape, for least to get a day. On Monday, Seattle State Superior The courtroom Judge David Chalfant reigned over in her favor and issued a brief restraining buy stopping the distribution from the film. Yet , the evaluate declined to quit media sites from airing the racy footage any time they occur to get their hands on that.

Noa’s lawyer, Male impotence Meyer, is definitely arguing that his consumer didn’t disobey any confidentiality agreements with Lopez when he started store shopping the job around. He claims that the footage is not really sex video tape and says he’s just making a mockumentary regarding the couple’s tumultuous romance.

Although Noa was unable to release the movie, this individual still would like to do so. He reportedly states that the record is safe to discharge now that Lopez possesses withdrawn her claim against him even though the case was at arbitration. In respect to In Touch magazine, the master tape from the footage is currently in a central depository nevertheless Meyer thinks that they have discovered a legal loophole and will be allowed to release that soon.

J Lo’s ex-husband has already been caught with his hand in the cookie jar once before, and the «I Can’t Imagine It» singer isn’t bringing any chances this time around. She lately sued Noa for the purpose of $10 , 000, 000 claiming that he breached a privacy agreement when he attempted to offer the home online video photos from their marital life, which simply lasted 11 months.

Noa has already filed his own legal action against the alluring star, saying that the girl wrongfully fired him by her Pasadena restaurant in 2006. He also attempted to write a tell-all about their relationship and was blocked by simply Lopez’s legal professionals. In that past round of litigation, Noa was ordered to pay for the singer money and arranged not to outline for monetary gain any personal details about their relationship.